With the likelihood of making out towards the target, discover a serious interaction ranging from grandiose narcissism and you will new member sex, ? = .161, t = dos.819, p = .005. This correspondence try showed inside Fig dos. The straightforward mountains for males (easy mountain = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you will female (effortless mountain = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) were not tall. Grandiose narcissists did not express an elevated odds of making out with an attached address over just one (? = .068, t = step one.127, p = .261), indicating you to grandiose narcissism was not with the partner poaching to possess a primary-title fling.
Grandiose narcissists often report spouse poaching -especially for the brand new quick-term . not, a question stays on whether they select members of dating a lot more really worth getting than just people that are unmarried. Widman and you may McNulty reason that grandiose narcissistic tendencies citas bisexual will be triggered all over situations on average (like the thinking-statement from lifetime frequency of intimate choices), but not be activated when placed in a certain disease. Thus, you will be able that grandiose narcissists disclose a history of enjoyable for the spouse poaching, but never fundamentally look for those who work in matchmaking to be ideal friends. We looked at that it possibility during the four degree.
Mate poaching collection.
For very long-name mate poaching, grandiose narcissism is a critical predictor for women (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you can a marginally tall predictor for men (? = .218, t = step 1.725, p = .088). None of the Huge Four details was significant. Grandiose narcissism was not a critical predictor of achievements during the poaching towards long-term for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nonetheless it try for ladies (? = .340, t = dos.369, p = .021). None of your own additional factors was basically extreme with the exception of women’s neuroticism; whenever ladies was basically a whole lot more neurotic, it claimed way more victory in the poaching for some time-identity sexual relationships.
Of interest, grandiose narcissism was not associated with the mate poaching certainly one of guys. This outcome is in keeping with overall performance advertised by the Kardum and you can acquaintances . Thus, you’ll be able to that grandiose narcissistic women are with greater regularity guilty off companion poaching.
Material and processes
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.